Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty

Mathew D. Staver

Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty

Mathew D. Staver

School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Mathew D. Staver writes about the Abstention Doctrine. The Article provides an analysis of the Anti-Injunction Act and the applicability of the Pullman, Younger, Rooker-Feldman, Brillhart, and Colorado River Abstention Doctrines, paying particular attention to how each doctrine affects a litigator's practice.

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
State	Published - Jan 1 1997

Disciplines

Law

Access to Document

Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State SovereigntyFinal published version, 2.72 MBLicense: CC BY

Cite this

@article{93de9f5f9e9f40dfb5b62bdc68cf86a3,

title = "Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty",

abstract = " Mathew D. Staver writes about the Abstention Doctrine. The Article provides an analysis of the Anti-Injunction Act and the applicability of the Pullman, Younger, Rooker-Feldman, Brillhart, and Colorado River Abstention Doctrines, paying particular attention to how each doctrine affects a litigator's practice.",

author = "Staver, {Mathew D.}",

year = "1997",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty

AU - Staver, Mathew D.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Mathew D. Staver writes about the Abstention Doctrine. The Article provides an analysis of the Anti-Injunction Act and the applicability of the Pullman, Younger, Rooker-Feldman, Brillhart, and Colorado River Abstention Doctrines, paying particular attention to how each doctrine affects a litigator's practice.

AB - Mathew D. Staver writes about the Abstention Doctrine. The Article provides an analysis of the Anti-Injunction Act and the applicability of the Pullman, Younger, Rooker-Feldman, Brillhart, and Colorado River Abstention Doctrines, paying particular attention to how each doctrine affects a litigator's practice.

UR - https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lusol_fac_pubs/24

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Balancing Federal Court Intervention with State Sovereignty

Abstract

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this