Evangelical Christianity and the Philosophy of Interreligious Dialogue

Michael S. Jones

Evangelical Christianity and the Philosophy of Interreligious Dialogue

Michael S. Jones

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

In this essay, the author, an evangelical Christian, seeks to analyze the arguments for and against evangelical participation in interreligious dialogue. He finds that, while the arguments against evangelical participation in dialogue suggest some important boundaries for dialogue, they do not completely militate against it. Conversely, the arguments for dialogue form a persuasive case for evangelical participation

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
State	Published - Jul 1 1999
Externally published	Yes

Publication series

Name	SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations

Access to Document

Fulltext

http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/77

Cite this

@misc{3f5eaeae4d0640d2bb6420b7334b2be5,

title = "Evangelical Christianity and the Philosophy of Interreligious Dialogue",

abstract = "In this essay, the author, an evangelical Christian, seeks to analyze the arguments for and against evangelical participation in interreligious dialogue. He finds that, while the arguments against evangelical participation in dialogue suggest some important boundaries for dialogue, they do not completely militate against it. Conversely, the arguments for dialogue form a persuasive case for evangelical participation",

author = "Jones, {Michael S.}",

year = "1999",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

series = "SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evangelical Christianity and the Philosophy of Interreligious Dialogue

AU - Jones, Michael S.

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - In this essay, the author, an evangelical Christian, seeks to analyze the arguments for and against evangelical participation in interreligious dialogue. He finds that, while the arguments against evangelical participation in dialogue suggest some important boundaries for dialogue, they do not completely militate against it. Conversely, the arguments for dialogue form a persuasive case for evangelical participation

AB - In this essay, the author, an evangelical Christian, seeks to analyze the arguments for and against evangelical participation in interreligious dialogue. He finds that, while the arguments against evangelical participation in dialogue suggest some important boundaries for dialogue, they do not completely militate against it. Conversely, the arguments for dialogue form a persuasive case for evangelical participation

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations

ER -