Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism (Part 1)

Thomas D. Ice

Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism (Part 1)

Thomas D. Ice

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

A history of the rapture is of necessity a history of pretribulationism, since most other views do not distinguish between the two phases of Christ's return—the rapture and second advent. The partial rapture and midtribulationism have been developed only within the past 100 years.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
State	Published - May 8 2009
Externally published	Yes

Publication series

Name	Article Archives

Access to Document

Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism (Part 1)

http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/114

Cite this

@misc{487d26c4fbe04e6d8a5a5751fd111115,

title = "Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism (Part 1)",

abstract = "A history of the rapture is of necessity a history of pretribulationism, since most other views do not distinguish between the two phases of Christ's return—the rapture and second advent. The partial rapture and midtribulationism have been developed only within the past 100 years.",

author = "Ice, {Thomas D.}",

year = "2009",

month = may,

day = "8",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

series = "Article Archives",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Myths of the Origin of Pretribulationism (Part 1)

AU - Ice, Thomas D.

PY - 2009/5/8

Y1 - 2009/5/8

N2 - A history of the rapture is of necessity a history of pretribulationism, since most other views do not distinguish between the two phases of Christ's return—the rapture and second advent. The partial rapture and midtribulationism have been developed only within the past 100 years.

AB - A history of the rapture is of necessity a history of pretribulationism, since most other views do not distinguish between the two phases of Christ's return—the rapture and second advent. The partial rapture and midtribulationism have been developed only within the past 100 years.

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - Article Archives

ER -