Re-examining New Testament Textual-Critical Principles and Practices Used to Negate Inerrancy

James A. Borland

Re-examining New Testament Textual-Critical Principles and Practices Used to Negate Inerrancy

James A. Borland

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

A consistent application of the most widely accepted principles and practices of New Testament textual criticism has resulted in stark declarations that the original autographs contained factual errors. The textual evidence for the problem passages of Matthew 1:7,10 and Luke 23:45 are carefully examined in this light. These commonly accepted principles are reexamined in light of the inerrancy debate in order to restructure the principles to improve their usefulness in the more general areas of the textual criticism of the NT and yet preserve the integrity of the NT autographs.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
State	Published - Dec 1 1982
Externally published	Yes

Publication series

Name	SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations

Access to Document

Fulltext

http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/31

Cite this

@misc{dfb55a25694e46e1a1724455584f6083,

title = "Re-examining New Testament Textual-Critical Principles and Practices Used to Negate Inerrancy",

abstract = "A consistent application of the most widely accepted principles and practices of New Testament textual criticism has resulted in stark declarations that the original autographs contained factual errors. The textual evidence for the problem passages of Matthew 1:7,10 and Luke 23:45 are carefully examined in this light. These commonly accepted principles are reexamined in light of the inerrancy debate in order to restructure the principles to improve their usefulness in the more general areas of the textual criticism of the NT and yet preserve the integrity of the NT autographs.",

author = "Borland, {James A.}",

year = "1982",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

series = "SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Re-examining New Testament Textual-Critical Principles and Practices Used to Negate Inerrancy

AU - Borland, James A.

PY - 1982/12/1

Y1 - 1982/12/1

N2 - A consistent application of the most widely accepted principles and practices of New Testament textual criticism has resulted in stark declarations that the original autographs contained factual errors. The textual evidence for the problem passages of Matthew 1:7,10 and Luke 23:45 are carefully examined in this light. These commonly accepted principles are reexamined in light of the inerrancy debate in order to restructure the principles to improve their usefulness in the more general areas of the textual criticism of the NT and yet preserve the integrity of the NT autographs.

AB - A consistent application of the most widely accepted principles and practices of New Testament textual criticism has resulted in stark declarations that the original autographs contained factual errors. The textual evidence for the problem passages of Matthew 1:7,10 and Luke 23:45 are carefully examined in this light. These commonly accepted principles are reexamined in light of the inerrancy debate in order to restructure the principles to improve their usefulness in the more general areas of the textual criticism of the NT and yet preserve the integrity of the NT autographs.

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations

ER -