The Leadership Assumptions of American Statesmen during the Federal Convention and Ratification debates 1787-1789

Darin L. Gerdes

The Leadership Assumptions of American Statesmen during the Federal Convention and Ratification debates 1787-1789

Darin L. Gerdes

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

This study sought to ascertain and analyze the leadership assumptions of American Statesmen during the Constitutional Convention and ratification debates. The researcher examined the primary source public debates from 1787-1789. This study identified the Statesmen’s view of leadership, which emerged from their writings and debates. Their assumptions were classified into assumptions on the nature of man, the nature of power, the nature of the people, the nature of government, and the nature of society. The Statesmen’s views were then compared and contrasted to contemporary leadership literature.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
State	Published - Jan 1 2003
Externally published	Yes

Publication series

Name	Faculty Dissertations

Access to Document

Fulltext

http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/fac_dis/7

Cite this

@misc{c220a7218cef4adf9027077256cb7293,

title = "The Leadership Assumptions of American Statesmen during the Federal Convention and Ratification debates 1787-1789",

abstract = "This study sought to ascertain and analyze the leadership assumptions of American Statesmen during the Constitutional Convention and ratification debates. The researcher examined the primary source public debates from 1787-1789. This study identified the Statesmen{\textquoteright}s view of leadership, which emerged from their writings and debates. Their assumptions were classified into assumptions on the nature of man, the nature of power, the nature of the people, the nature of government, and the nature of society. The Statesmen{\textquoteright}s views were then compared and contrasted to contemporary leadership literature.",

author = "Gerdes, {Darin L.}",

year = "2003",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

series = "Faculty Dissertations",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The Leadership Assumptions of American Statesmen during the Federal Convention and Ratification debates 1787-1789

AU - Gerdes, Darin L.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - This study sought to ascertain and analyze the leadership assumptions of American Statesmen during the Constitutional Convention and ratification debates. The researcher examined the primary source public debates from 1787-1789. This study identified the Statesmen’s view of leadership, which emerged from their writings and debates. Their assumptions were classified into assumptions on the nature of man, the nature of power, the nature of the people, the nature of government, and the nature of society. The Statesmen’s views were then compared and contrasted to contemporary leadership literature.

AB - This study sought to ascertain and analyze the leadership assumptions of American Statesmen during the Constitutional Convention and ratification debates. The researcher examined the primary source public debates from 1787-1789. This study identified the Statesmen’s view of leadership, which emerged from their writings and debates. Their assumptions were classified into assumptions on the nature of man, the nature of power, the nature of the people, the nature of government, and the nature of society. The Statesmen’s views were then compared and contrasted to contemporary leadership literature.

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - Faculty Dissertations

ER -